- AI SEO Rainmakers
AI SEO Rainmakers on Reddit: What People Say, and What Is Missing
Affiliate disclosure: we paid $269 for our own seat and earn a commission if you join through our links. That does not change the price you pay.
If you searched "ai seo rainmakers reddit" hoping for a long thread of members arguing about whether Charles Floate's Skool community is worth $269 a month, you will be disappointed. We searched Reddit on 6 and 7 September 2026, site-wide and in r/SEO, r/bigseo, r/juststart and r/AISEO. We found one genuine member thread, a lot of Charles Floate history, and a law-firm marketing thread that Google keeps serving by mistake. This page lays all of it out, then answers the questions Redditors would ask from what we verified as paying members.
What Reddit actually holds, as of 7 September 2026
The community launched on 10 August 2026, so it is under a month old. That explains most of the silence. Here is the full list of threads that mention it by name and are not course-leak or piracy posts, which we will not link.
| r/DigitalMarketing, 22 Aug 2026 | "Charles Floate's Rainmakers Community Review", posted by a member 12 days after launch. 9 comments, 1 point. The only genuine thread about the community. |
| r/AISEOInsider, Aug 2026 | Two promotional posts about Charles Floate's AI SEO, zero comments each. The same account also promotes Julian Goldie's AI Success Lab, so these read as marketing, not discussion. |
| Course-leak subreddits, Aug and Sep 2026 | Automated posts selling pirated copies. We do not link these and do not treat them as reviews. |
That is one real thread. Our rule for this page was simple: if we found fewer than three, say so rather than pad the page with unrelated Rainmaker threads. So here it is. As of 7 September 2026, Reddit has almost nothing to say about AI SEO Rainmakers, and the one thing it does say is mildly positive.
The one genuine thread, summarised
The r/DigitalMarketing poster, colinlma, describes himself as a member and opens the thread for questions. The post body is marked as a spoiler, so the comments carry the substance. Three exchanges matter.
- A commenter asks how good the private library is, including the "secret prompts" and "jail breaks". The poster replies that he has not gone through it because he has been swamped with his own work, but that there is "a lot of activity and updates every day", and that his goal in joining was community more than the library. He adds that Charles was running a large spam-update analysis at the time.
- Another commenter asks whether there is much about actually making money or whether it is high level. The poster says it is not a "here's how you get leads" package, but there is SEO strategy and positioning that helps you close clients, and specific strategies to raise earnings. He is explicit that nothing is packaged as "here's how you make an extra $1,500 a month".
- One comment was removed by moderators, and a fourth asks for beginner YouTube videos, which the thread does not answer.
Read it at reddit.com/r/DigitalMarketing. It matches what we found from the inside: the feed is the product, the classroom is thin on day one, and the pitch is operator strategy rather than a lead-gen recipe. Our full findings are on the review page.
See the current rate on Skool →$269/mo · next step $279 · 7-day refund
Why Google shows a law-firm "RainMaker sham" thread
Search "ai seo rainmakers review" and, as of 6 September 2026 in the US, the first or second result is an r/LawFirm thread from 17 July 2018 titled "Is RainMaker just a total sham?". It has 15 points and 21 comments, and it has nothing to do with Charles Floate. The poster is a marketing contractor for a workers' compensation lawyer who hired The Rainmaker Institute, a marketing agency for law firms, and got Facebook followers instead of cases. The replies debate Facebook ads for lawyers. Nobody in it has heard of Skool.
Google serves it because the word "Rainmaker" is shared by several unrelated companies and no on-topic review thread exists to outrank it. The same search also surfaces Rainmaker Family on Trustpilot, RainMaker martial-arts software on Software Advice, and rainmakeragency.ai. None of them connects to the Skool community. If you land on any of those, you are reading about a different business.
Charles Floate's long history on SEO Reddit
The community is new. Charles Floate is not, and Reddit has been arguing about him for twelve years. Everything below we opened and read ourselves on 7 September 2026.
| r/IAmA, 15 Jul 2014 | "I am Charles Floate, I Game Google For A Living. AMA!" posted as u/GodOfSEO. 9 points at 55 percent upvoted, 177 comments. He explains white, grey and black hat and takes questions. |
| r/bigseo, 16 Jul 2018 | "Who are the big names in black hat SEO?" One reply names him: grey hat by then, but his old God of SEO blog was "a blackhat goldmine", and his blogs were deindexed by Google. |
| r/SEO, 27 Mar 2024 | "Charles Floate SEO courses - looking for reviews?" 0 points, 3 comments. The one substantive reply says not to buy, on the grounds that people who can do SEO do not sell courses. No buyer answered. |
| r/seogrowth, 6 Oct 2025 | "Black Hat is booming! White hat is coping!" shares his screenshots. 8 points, 10 comments. Replies call him good at promoting himself and accuse him of lying; one says he is in it for himself while Google is failing on quality. |
| r/linkbuilding, 15 Jan 2026 | "I am Charles Floate. AMA!" after he took over the subreddit as moderator. 43 points at 98 percent upvoted, 81 comments. He answers on parasite SEO, PBNs, guest post selection and getting clients, and openly promotes PressWhizz in replies. |
The pattern is consistent. When he hosts the thread, the room is friendly and the questions are technical. When someone else posts about him, the replies split between "one of the best" and "self-promoter". That matches his own bio, which we cover on the Charles Floate page: penalised by Google in 2013 and 2016 for teaching black hat openly, 97.2K followers on X, and a reputation built on saying what other SEOs keep quiet.
On X, every Rainmakers post we could find in the first three weeks came from Charles himself: seats-left countdowns, call highlights, and an early September 2026 post that the community had hit 30 five-star reviews on day 19. Those are his claims. We found no independent X review of the community as of 7 September 2026.
What members say on the Skool page itself
The reviews Reddit lacks sit on the Skool about page. As of 6 September 2026 it showed 5.0 from 31 reviews, with five visible. Every reviewer had been a member for 11 to 21 days, so read them as first impressions, not long-term results.
- Marc Moeller: one of the few SEO communities he has joined where the information is "genuinely advanced and immediately useful".
- Alex Horbov: a "superb community" with practical knowledge, tools for implementation and members ready to answer.
- Nur Sarowar: most communities sell you courses and leave you to it; this one hands you live site teardowns where you watch Charles reverse engineer real member sites.
- Cindi Vinette: "so much value" in the courses and in content from experienced members and Charles.
- Waqar Hussain: if you are serious about SEO, "especially Black Hat SEO", this is a group worth joining, and Charles is one of the best.
Two things stand out. Skool only lets paying members leave reviews, so there are no drive-by ratings. And the black-hat remark from Waqar Hussain is a selling point to him and a warning to anyone running a compliance-heavy brand. We cannot verify any member's income claims, and none of these five reviews makes one.
Our own paid-member verdict
We paid $269 on 2 September 2026 and have been inside since. Our score is 4.8 out of 5. The weekly Wednesday call is the core product: Charles stays until the last question is answered, and the three recordings we watched ran 3h57m in total. The feed passed 540 posts in three weeks and he answers in threads himself. Against that, it is the most expensive AI SEO Skool group we have found and the price rises $10 every 25 members. Seven of ten courses were locked on day one, and total classroom video is 6h37m rather than the 15-plus hours implied on the sales page. The full breakdown, with scores for depth, activity, value and beginner-friendliness, is on the review page.
Open the Skool about page →314 members · 5.0 from 31 reviews · checked 6 Sep 2026
Questions Redditors would ask, answered from our facts
These are the questions that get asked in every "is this course worth it" thread on r/SEO. Reddit has not asked them about this community yet, so we answer them from what we checked.
How much is it, really?
$269 a month as of 6 September 2026, for members 276 to 300. The founding 100 paid $179 and sold out in 7 hours. The rate rises $10 every 25 members, never comes down, and your rate locks for as long as you stay subscribed. No coupon or promo code has ever been offered. The full ladder is on the pricing page.
Is there a refund?
Yes, 7 days, 100 percent, no questions asked, and you keep what you downloaded. One condition printed on the Skool page: send Charles a direct message before you reach Level 3, which is 20 likes on your posts. Post heavily in week one and you can pass that mark on day four.
How black hat is it?
Openly grey and black. Parasite SEO is taught as a core play, there is a course called Charles' Private Dark Library, and one lesson title is "Bypass Fable Safeguards". If your employer or client would object to any of that, this is the wrong community. Rival groups such as AI SEO Mastery Pro stay closer to agency-safe work; we compare them on the alternatives page.
Why is everything locked when you join?
Courses are gated by Skool engagement level, which you earn through likes on your posts. Level 1 opens Foundations only. Level 2 needs 5 points and opens the tools and repos. Level 3 needs 20 and opens the call recordings. We reached Level 3 in three days. Our Skool page walks through the whole ladder.
Is it for beginners?
No. Foundations is a 38-minute course, and everything after it assumes you run a site or client and can use a terminal. Charles's own listicle says people with no site and no client will not get their money back out of it. We scored beginner friendliness 2.8 out of 5. If you are starting from zero, a $27 group such as AI Ranking is the cheaper place to find out whether you like the work.
Is Charles Floate legit?
He is a real, public person with an 18-year record, two Google penalties and a long X and Reddit history. Billing runs through Skool, which handles subscriptions and cancellations as a third party. We paid and had access within minutes. Whether his methods suit you is a separate question, and the Reddit threads above show both answers.
People also search for the singular AI SEO Rainmaker. It is the same community, and this page covers both spellings.
Questions people ask
Is there an AI SEO Rainmakers review on Reddit?
One, as of 7 September 2026. A member posted a short thread titled Charles Floate's Rainmakers Community Review on r/DigitalMarketing on 22 August 2026. It has 9 comments and the poster answers questions rather than scoring the community. No thread exists on r/SEO, r/bigseo or r/juststart. Google's top result for the review query is an unrelated 2018 r/LawFirm thread about a law-firm marketing company called The Rainmaker Institute.
What does the Reddit thread say about AI SEO Rainmakers?
The poster says they joined for the community more than the library, that there is a lot of activity and updates every day, and that the material is SEO strategy and positioning rather than a packaged make-an-extra-1,500-a-month system. One commenter asks about the private library and jailbreak prompts; the poster had not gone through it yet. Another asks whether it covers making money; the answer is that it covers strategy that helps you close clients.
What is Charles Floate's history on Reddit?
He posts as u/GodOfSEO. He ran an r/IAmA titled I am Charles Floate, I Game Google For A Living on 15 July 2014, and a second AMA on r/linkbuilding on 15 January 2026 after taking over that subreddit as moderator. Older threads mention him as a black-hat name from his God of SEO blog era, and a 2024 r/SEO thread asking for course reviews drew one dismissive reply. Reddit opinion of him is split and always has been.
Why does Google show a law-firm RainMaker thread for AI SEO Rainmakers reviews?
Because no on-topic review thread exists yet and the word Rainmaker is shared by several unrelated companies. The r/LawFirm thread Is RainMaker just a total sham, from 17 July 2018, is about The Rainmaker Institute, a marketing agency for lawyers. Other noise includes Rainmaker Family on Trustpilot and RainMaker martial-arts software. None of them has any connection to Charles Floate or his Skool community.
What do members say on the AI SEO Rainmakers Skool page?
The Skool about page showed 5.0 from 31 reviews on 6 September 2026, with five reviews visible. Marc Moeller calls the information genuinely advanced and immediately useful. Alex Horbov praises the practical knowledge and tools. Nur Sarowar highlights the live site teardowns. Cindi Vinette cites the value in courses and member content. Waqar Hussain says it suits people serious about black hat SEO. All reviewers were 11 to 21 days in.
Is AI SEO Rainmakers worth $269 a month according to Reddit?
Reddit has not answered that question yet. The single member thread is positive but brief and does not discuss price. Our own paid-member verdict, after joining on 2 September 2026 at $269, is 4.8 out of 5: strong weekly call and active feed, offset by the highest price in its category, level-gated courses on day one and a heavy black-hat lean. The 7-day refund lets you check it against your own needs before committing.